<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter&#8217;s swan song</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tdhurst.com/twitters-swan-song/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tdhurst.com/twitters-swan-song</link>
	<description>Failure is my muse.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 01:41:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/>	<item>
		<title>By: tdhurst</title>
		<link>http://tdhurst.com/twitters-swan-song/comment-page-1#comment-1709</link>
		<dc:creator>tdhurst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 08:36:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tdhurst.com/?p=2000#comment-1709</guid>
		<description>My issue with it was more related to defining what Twitter was perceived as versus what Twitter truly is, a perception that has eluded me until now.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I have no problem with what Twitter is now and I will continue to use it in the exact same way, I just wanted to address my, well, sorrows for an experience that was unlike anything possible before and is now fading into the background.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I see networks such as these as a refuge from the canned conversations and persuasive visuals that too often permeate our lives. It was a bit naive and a bit short-sighted, but it was an honest attempt at saying goodbye to an experience that will never be replicated.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don&#039;t fault the mainstream for getting on board, it was me who invited them. What came off as complaining was simply sorrow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My issue with it was more related to defining what Twitter was perceived as versus what Twitter truly is, a perception that has eluded me until now.</p>
<p>I have no problem with what Twitter is now and I will continue to use it in the exact same way, I just wanted to address my, well, sorrows for an experience that was unlike anything possible before and is now fading into the background.</p>
<p>I see networks such as these as a refuge from the canned conversations and persuasive visuals that too often permeate our lives. It was a bit naive and a bit short-sighted, but it was an honest attempt at saying goodbye to an experience that will never be replicated.</p>
<p>I don&#39;t fault the mainstream for getting on board, it was me who invited them. What came off as complaining was simply sorrow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kelleyrobinett</title>
		<link>http://tdhurst.com/twitters-swan-song/comment-page-1#comment-1708</link>
		<dc:creator>kelleyrobinett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 08:25:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tdhurst.com/?p=2000#comment-1708</guid>
		<description>not ball busting...  I just don&#039;t understand your need to define and declare absolutes about a service that means so many different things to its many users.  While Twitter may not be what it once was to you, the reality is that Twitter is just now coming into its own.  Twitter is an aggregator, it is lightning fast dissemination, the future of sourcing and the great equalizer when it comes to cross-class communication.  None of those things sound &quot;dead&quot; to me.  Hate the celebrity idolization culture all you want but, celeb &quot;news&quot; magazines, shows and websites are most likely a billion dollar industry.  Thanks to Twitter, the celeb culture consumers can comment directly to the celebrity and even get direct comment back.  That&#039;s a goldmine.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You are definitely the early adopter type.  It&#039;s not a bad thing but, you have to realize it to either, A, understand your place in product life cycle or B, be someone who can transition from early adopter to long-term user without the drama and pains.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Early adopters are both the key to early success and a hindrance to long term growth.  They jump on something fast, many times to be first and define what &quot;it&quot; is, then complain and bail when it grows out of what they defined &quot;it&quot; as.  If a company ignores the large emerging market needs in order to placate the early adopters it is bound to fail.  This is true with companies, products, social organizations, churches... everything.  The people who jump in first are usually the most put off by the real growth that is necessary to sustain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>not ball busting&#8230;  I just don&#39;t understand your need to define and declare absolutes about a service that means so many different things to its many users.  While Twitter may not be what it once was to you, the reality is that Twitter is just now coming into its own.  Twitter is an aggregator, it is lightning fast dissemination, the future of sourcing and the great equalizer when it comes to cross-class communication.  None of those things sound &#8220;dead&#8221; to me.  Hate the celebrity idolization culture all you want but, celeb &#8220;news&#8221; magazines, shows and websites are most likely a billion dollar industry.  Thanks to Twitter, the celeb culture consumers can comment directly to the celebrity and even get direct comment back.  That&#39;s a goldmine.</p>
<p>You are definitely the early adopter type.  It&#39;s not a bad thing but, you have to realize it to either, A, understand your place in product life cycle or B, be someone who can transition from early adopter to long-term user without the drama and pains.  </p>
<p>Early adopters are both the key to early success and a hindrance to long term growth.  They jump on something fast, many times to be first and define what &#8220;it&#8221; is, then complain and bail when it grows out of what they defined &#8220;it&#8221; as.  If a company ignores the large emerging market needs in order to placate the early adopters it is bound to fail.  This is true with companies, products, social organizations, churches&#8230; everything.  The people who jump in first are usually the most put off by the real growth that is necessary to sustain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tdhurst</title>
		<link>http://tdhurst.com/twitters-swan-song/comment-page-1#comment-1703</link>
		<dc:creator>tdhurst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 22:22:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tdhurst.com/?p=2000#comment-1703</guid>
		<description>I DO owe you a high five.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I DO owe you a high five.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tdhurst</title>
		<link>http://tdhurst.com/twitters-swan-song/comment-page-1#comment-1702</link>
		<dc:creator>tdhurst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 20:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tdhurst.com/?p=2000#comment-1702</guid>
		<description>The way I use it affects others and the ways others use affects me.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What&#039;s your insistence on busting my balls on this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The way I use it affects others and the ways others use affects me.</p>
<p>What&#39;s your insistence on busting my balls on this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kelleyrobinett</title>
		<link>http://tdhurst.com/twitters-swan-song/comment-page-1#comment-1701</link>
		<dc:creator>kelleyrobinett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 20:06:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tdhurst.com/?p=2000#comment-1701</guid>
		<description>Twitter is a tool not a place.  As more people join, they are finding more ways to use the tool to best suit their needs and wants.  I bet if you would quit trying to project your micro needs of twitter onto the macro of the tool as a whole you might just find out that it is to you what you always thought it was and wanted it to be.  Maybe worry less about how others use it because, in reality, it has zero effect on you and the ways you use it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twitter is a tool not a place.  As more people join, they are finding more ways to use the tool to best suit their needs and wants.  I bet if you would quit trying to project your micro needs of twitter onto the macro of the tool as a whole you might just find out that it is to you what you always thought it was and wanted it to be.  Maybe worry less about how others use it because, in reality, it has zero effect on you and the ways you use it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tommypierucki</title>
		<link>http://tdhurst.com/twitters-swan-song/comment-page-1#comment-1700</link>
		<dc:creator>tommypierucki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 13:21:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tdhurst.com/?p=2000#comment-1700</guid>
		<description>Keep at it.  Your efforts may be taking its toll, but the juice will be worth the squeeze.  You still owe me a high five.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keep at it.  Your efforts may be taking its toll, but the juice will be worth the squeeze.  You still owe me a high five.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew k</title>
		<link>http://tdhurst.com/twitters-swan-song/comment-page-1#comment-1699</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew k</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 12:17:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tdhurst.com/?p=2000#comment-1699</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m following, at this moment, 861 people on Twitter, and the only ones who don&#039;t interact are ones who have something actually important to share, something to tell me that I actually want to hear.  There might be one or two exceptions, and I don&#039;t expect that anyone else would follow the same 861 people and find the few who never interact to be interesting, but all this business that all everyone ever does is share links is total crap.  It&#039;s a myth just like &quot;Twitter? Why would I tell people what I&#039;m having for lunch?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;m following, at this moment, 861 people on Twitter, and the only ones who don&#39;t interact are ones who have something actually important to share, something to tell me that I actually want to hear.  There might be one or two exceptions, and I don&#39;t expect that anyone else would follow the same 861 people and find the few who never interact to be interesting, but all this business that all everyone ever does is share links is total crap.  It&#39;s a myth just like &#8220;Twitter? Why would I tell people what I&#39;m having for lunch?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tdhurst</title>
		<link>http://tdhurst.com/twitters-swan-song/comment-page-1#comment-1698</link>
		<dc:creator>tdhurst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 11:59:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tdhurst.com/?p=2000#comment-1698</guid>
		<description>I gave up on most ppl a long time ago, as I got tired of begging ppl  &lt;br&gt;to ve a part of something larger than themselves.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Perhaps Twitter is just a highly accurate depiction of a society  &lt;br&gt;that&#039;s more interested in reality shows and pre-packaged lives than  &lt;br&gt;new experiences that might not be 100% safe or PC.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This is very apparent when you see scratching-the-surface events like  &lt;br&gt;ignite or any of the *FNs regularly attended, but events like PodCamp  &lt;br&gt;or even Gangplank happenings shunned by the non-geek crowd. People are  &lt;br&gt;scared to change and you can&#039;t teach or include them if they&#039;re not  &lt;br&gt;willing to step on the field.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Too many still view the Internet as separated from real life when it&#039;s  &lt;br&gt;really a simple extension of it. This attitude is nearly impossible to  &lt;br&gt;change without explaining the concept repeatedly, individually, which  &lt;br&gt;takes its toll.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I gave up on most ppl a long time ago, as I got tired of begging ppl  <br />to ve a part of something larger than themselves.</p>
<p>Perhaps Twitter is just a highly accurate depiction of a society  <br />that&#39;s more interested in reality shows and pre-packaged lives than  <br />new experiences that might not be 100% safe or PC.</p>
<p>This is very apparent when you see scratching-the-surface events like  <br />ignite or any of the *FNs regularly attended, but events like PodCamp  <br />or even Gangplank happenings shunned by the non-geek crowd. People are  <br />scared to change and you can&#39;t teach or include them if they&#39;re not  <br />willing to step on the field.</p>
<p>Too many still view the Internet as separated from real life when it&#39;s  <br />really a simple extension of it. This attitude is nearly impossible to  <br />change without explaining the concept repeatedly, individually, which  <br />takes its toll.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tommypierucki</title>
		<link>http://tdhurst.com/twitters-swan-song/comment-page-1#comment-1697</link>
		<dc:creator>tommypierucki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 11:22:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tdhurst.com/?p=2000#comment-1697</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll be the first to admit, I follow a ton of people that I don&#039;t communicate with regularly.  On the other hand, I don&#039;t want to unfollow them for reasons of my own.  Mostly because a lot of them don&#039;t tweet too often, and when they do, I wanna know about it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think it still has a community feeling to it.  The looks I get when I tell people that I&#039;m on twitter, and that I use it all the time are varied.  Most of the looks are dismissive.  A lot of them are people looking at me and saying, &quot;I don&#039;t twitter.  People don&#039;t need to know that I&#039;m eating ice cream&quot;.  I am constantly in an environment where twitter is just something on the internet.  But to me, it&#039;s a whole new community.  Tons of people I would have never met, I&#039;ve met from twitter.  I learn from them everyday.  I learn from you all the time, and I&#039;ve only talked to you for a total of about 20 seconds.  Have you turned a blind eye to all of the newer users in your own community that you&#039;re trying to make better?  Broadcasting to one person, is another person&#039;s way of finding they&#039;re niche followers.  Maybe, now that twitter is getting bigger, niches are becoming harder and harder to find.  If that&#039;s true, maybe twitter is just going through a growing pain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;ll be the first to admit, I follow a ton of people that I don&#39;t communicate with regularly.  On the other hand, I don&#39;t want to unfollow them for reasons of my own.  Mostly because a lot of them don&#39;t tweet too often, and when they do, I wanna know about it.</p>
<p>I think it still has a community feeling to it.  The looks I get when I tell people that I&#39;m on twitter, and that I use it all the time are varied.  Most of the looks are dismissive.  A lot of them are people looking at me and saying, &#8220;I don&#39;t twitter.  People don&#39;t need to know that I&#39;m eating ice cream&#8221;.  I am constantly in an environment where twitter is just something on the internet.  But to me, it&#39;s a whole new community.  Tons of people I would have never met, I&#39;ve met from twitter.  I learn from them everyday.  I learn from you all the time, and I&#39;ve only talked to you for a total of about 20 seconds.  Have you turned a blind eye to all of the newer users in your own community that you&#39;re trying to make better?  Broadcasting to one person, is another person&#39;s way of finding they&#39;re niche followers.  Maybe, now that twitter is getting bigger, niches are becoming harder and harder to find.  If that&#39;s true, maybe twitter is just going through a growing pain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tdhurst</title>
		<link>http://tdhurst.com/twitters-swan-song/comment-page-1#comment-1696</link>
		<dc:creator>tdhurst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 11:12:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tdhurst.com/?p=2000#comment-1696</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think Twitter is going away, and perhaps I have too high of expectations. What I&#039;m seeing is far less communication and far more broadcasting, as too many people follow TONS of people, yet ignore them.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This isn&#039;t the fault of any specific person or event, and more of a reflection on the people itself. When I first started and up until, oh, late last year, Twitter was a community, not simply a communication tool. As it&#039;s become ubiquitous, and as rammed home with the launch of @anywhere today, the community has become fragmented, rather than niche focused.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This post is really me thinking out loud as I adjust my expectations regarding what I expect from others and what I expect from myself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#39;t think Twitter is going away, and perhaps I have too high of expectations. What I&#39;m seeing is far less communication and far more broadcasting, as too many people follow TONS of people, yet ignore them.</p>
<p>This isn&#39;t the fault of any specific person or event, and more of a reflection on the people itself. When I first started and up until, oh, late last year, Twitter was a community, not simply a communication tool. As it&#39;s become ubiquitous, and as rammed home with the launch of @anywhere today, the community has become fragmented, rather than niche focused.</p>
<p>This post is really me thinking out loud as I adjust my expectations regarding what I expect from others and what I expect from myself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

