tdhurst

(you can call me tyler)
“It's time to stop hiding behind brands, corporate policies or the way things used to be. Evolve. Get better. Let's learn from each other. It's called the Collaboration Revolution. Welcome to the Relationship Age.” - Tyler Hurst

Membership is earned, not rewarded

Let’s get real here.

Growth isn’t always good. Publicity doesn’t always make things better. Exposure won’t ensure quality.

That is why stories like this are disappointing.

I get that the mainstream media needs a figurehead and I understand that things need to be laid out, but to expose what is still a complex, fragile, ever-growing community connected together in hundreds of different ways as a one guy using Twitter feels wrong. It feels like a betrayal. When our leaders speak, we should expect great things.

“A culture is made — or destroyed — by its articulate voices.”

Not what we got.

We are a group built on the shoulders of other’s shoulders. Great things are happening and not because everyone is involved, but precisely the opposite. As in Seth Godin’s Tribes, one of the greatest things about highly-connected, highly-passionate groups is their exclusivity. Not everyone gets to see or play our games. They have to earn it.

Forget about good.
Good is a known quantity. Good is what we all agree on. Growth is not necessarily good. Growth is an exploration of unlit recesses that may or may not yield to our research. As long as you stick to good you’ll never have real growth.

They have to be innovators.

“I am an innovator. This is a term of distinction, a term of honor, rather than something to hide or apologize for. Anyone who has new or valuable ideas to offer stands outside the intellectual status quo. But the status quo is not a stream, let alone a ‘mainstream’. It is a stagnant swamp. It is the innovators who carry mankind forward.”

Stop being so damn focused on getting the word out. Real change doesn’t require publicity.

“Throughout the centuries there were men who took first steps down new roads armed with nothing but their own vision. Their goals differed, but they all had this in common: that the step was first, the road new, the vision unborrowed, and the response they received–hatred. The great creators–the thinkers, the artists, the scientists, the inventors–stood alone against the men of their time. Every great new thought was opposed. Every great new invention was denounced. The first motor was considered foolish. The first airplane was considered impossible. The power loom was considered vicious. Anesthesia was considered sinful. But the men of unborrowed vision went ahead. They fought, they suffered and they paid. But they won.”

Start focusing on what’s actually happening and the people who are making it real. And if you’re a local company, don’t ever take credit for someone who’s being honored for the hard work and passion of himself and many others.

Thanks to Ayn Rand for the quotes.

Podcast!

Share

You haven't subscribed yet?

  • Will
    Based on my understanding, the writers took some liberties and didn't share the articles before publication, hence me holding both guys basically blameless.
  • Strebel - nice work.

    Will - agreed. I want nothing to do with IgniteAZ or ImprovAZ if 200 new, clueless people show up because they read about it in the New Times. On another level, shouldn't people like Jeff and Evo be aware of this and guide the stories appropriately? Or even, SHOCK, turn them down?
  • Will
    Hear hear, Strebel. I just received to (and replied to) an email from Jeff, and I'm confident that the problem here is bad/misguided writing and NOT anything Jeff or Evo did.

    In short, I'm not hating the player, I'm hating the game.

    On a deeper level, I think there's a discussion to be had about publicity. In these reporters' and PR staffs' eagerness to apply their skills to the topic of Phoenix/Twitter/ImprovAZ, I believe they can easily kill passion of the group's members, alienate readers against the group, and/or reduce the fun of the activities themselves. Contrary to what I'm sure journalism and PR school teach, I believe tight-knit groups like this need to grow organically (maybe by asking members to invite friends personally outside of Facebook) in order to ensure that the group is represented accurately, that each friend gets an invitation message well-suited to them, and that the group remains well-knit and is somewhat self-limiting. If this New Times article is successful and attracts 100 new members, the thinking might go, who needs me anymore?
  • Strebel
    Talked to jeff today @gangplank, I assured him while he is bearing some of the backlash.. It is not Jeff anyone is miffed at. The article which jeff did not write is bearable but off target and the Sitewire PR piece is garbage.

    I personally give jeff kudos, getting out front and doing anything is more then majority have guts to do. So while I brandish my pitchfork in jest and call for the lynching of "King Jeff"... Jeff hustles for the overall betterment of the community and that is worth something.

    The newtimes writer is freakin clueless.

    Just wanted to clarify my issue is not with jeff per se, but with the premise of the newtimes piece and the following poop Sitewire released.
  • Evo - that's the point. Do you measure success by popularity?

    Kate - but it's not an educational message.

    Bryan - you're an idiot.

    Will - YES. Your second paragraph in your second comment nailed it.
  • Will
    More to the point, now that I got off my phone and read the whole New Times article: First, I resent the idea that I've been "ringled" or that those responsible for "spearheading" local events are somehow superior to those who were, I'll say, "speared." Seems like a few local people have decided that if nobody else will do it, by golly they will-- and that's wonderful! If it stopped there, the articles might not be hard to swallow. The press release really does it in though, and the news article still focuses on the "leaders" too much for the comfort of the "followers."

    Second, I think this may be the crux of Tyler's objection and my lingering distaste: what if, every time someone did something cool, it got over-hyped and washed out by publicity? Imagine two children playing on a swingset when suddenly five cameramen and news anchors rush over to interview them about how they're braving the dry Arizona heat to play on swings when they could be inside playing Xbox instead. Suddenly swinging doesn't seem so fun. The next day they come back and there are tons of other children at the park, and they try to swing but there's a long line so they go home and play Xbox instead. Moral of the story: it's individual willingness to try something new and fun, not public ability to find and latch on to the latest new and fun thing, that is rewarding and valuable. In many ways the two are mutually exclusive. Stop writing, start playing. If you're tired of playing by yourself, show others how to play too. But writing? That just kills the magic.
  • Will
    That article and release kinda stink to me, but mostly because it's all fun and games until someone gets a trophy. I like Jeff, am happy to see him succeed, and am happy to help him without taking credit for myself. He does deserve credit for stepping out and leading things. But I'm a partner, not a peon, and I think these articles might give the impression that these accomplishments didn't depend on the lighthearted participation of hundreds of people. The instant that a fun communal activity turns into someone else's resume material, participants wonder if they're just being used. I won't go to Gangplank if someone else is taking credit for my presence: "I built this and people are coming" is way different than "I built this, people are coming, and I could get them to do it again if I want to."
  • Bryan
    Do you even know what "reality" is?
  • kate
    sometimes though, an educational message is dependent on more people hearing it to become informed. Its not always true, but some ideas grow because of the amount of people exposed to it. Not saying its the case here, but sometimes it is. Of course change happens with out publicity, but generally it tends to happen faster with publicity. For better or worse i suppose.
  • Isn't it funny how people can read the exact same article and press release and come up with completely different opinions? Maybe it's not so funny at all.
blog comments powered by Disqus

Search

The archives run deep. Feel free to search older content using topic keywords.

Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes